Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

´Ù¸¥ ¿¬°á ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» °®´Â ÀÓÇ÷£Æ® »óºÎ ±¸Á¶¹°¿¡¼­ Á¶ÀÓ¼ú½Ä¿¡ µû¸¥ Áö´ëÁÖ ³ª»çÀÇ Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©°ª¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸

Removal Torque Values of Retaining Screws Tightened to Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Different Connection Systems by Various Tightening Technique

±¸°­È¸º¹ÀÀ¿ë°úÇÐÁö 2011³â 27±Ç 4È£ p.343 ~ 358
±èµ¿¿í, ÃÖÀ¯¼º, Á¶ÀÎÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èµ¿¿í ( Kim Dong-Wook ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÃÖÀ¯¼º ( Choi Yu-Sung ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¶ÀÎÈ£ ( Cho In-Ho ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract

ÀÓÇ÷£Æ® Ä¡·á°¡ º¸ÆíÈ­µÇ°í, ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÇüÅÂ¿Í Àç·áÀÇ »óºÎ ±¸Á¶¹°ÀÌ º¸±ÞµÇ¾ú´Ù. ±×¸®°í ½ÇÆп¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸°íµµ ´Ù¾çÇϸç, ±× Áß Áö´ë³ª»çÀÇ Ç®¸²Çö»óÀÌ °¡Àå ÈçÇÏ´Ù°í ÁöÀûµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¿ÜºÎ¿¬°á±¸Á¶¿Í ³»ºÎ¿¬°á±¸Á¶ ÀÓÇ÷£Æ®¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÁöÁöµÇ´Â »óºÎ ±¸Á¶¹°À» ³ª»ç·Î ¿¬°áÇÒ ¶§, ¼¼ °¡Áö ³ª»çÁ¶ÀÓ¼ø¼­¿Í µÎ °¡Áö ³ª»çÁ¶ÀÓ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ³ª»çÀÇ Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©°ªÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ³ª»çÁ¶ÀÓ¼ø¼­¿Í ³ª»çÁ¶ÀÓ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ ¿¬°á±¸Á¶¿¡ µû¶ó ³ª»çÇ®¸²Çö»ó¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿ÏÀü ¹«Ä¡¾Ç ÇϾǸðÇüÀ» ÀÚ°¡ÁßÇÕÇü ¾ÆÅ©¸±¸¯ ·¹ÁøÀ¸·Î Á¦ÀÛÇÏ°í ÀÌ°ø°£ ºÎÀ§¿¡ Á߽ɰ£ °Å¸®°¡ ¾à 15 mm µÇµµ·Ï ³× °³ÀÇ ÀÓÇ÷£Æ® °íÁ¤Ã¼ À¯»çü¸¦ °íÁ¤ÇÑ ÈÄ ¹Ù ŸÀÔÀ¸·Î ³³Çü Çü¼ºÇÏ¿© »óºÎ ±¸Á¶¹°À» ÁÖÁ¶ Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´´Ù. »óºÎ ±¸Á¶¹°°ú Á¤È®ÇÑ ÀûÇÕÀÌ µÇ´Â ÁÖ¸ðÇüÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇÑ ÈÄ ¿¬°á Àλó¹ýÀ¸·Î ¿ÜºÎ¿¬°á±¸Á¶, ³»ºÎ¿¬°á±¸Á¶¸¦ °¡Áö´Â ¿¬±¸¸ðÇüÀ» °¢°¢ 5°³¾¿ Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ ¸ðÇü¿¡¼­ °¢ ³ª»çÀÇ Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©°ªÀ» °¡Àå ¿ÞÂÊ¿¡ Á¶¿©Áö´Â ³ª»ç¸¦ 1¹ø ³ª»ç·Î ÇÏ°í °¡Àå ¿À¸¥ÂÊÀÇ ³ª»ç¸¦ 4¹ø ³ª»ç·Î ¸í¸íÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸ÕÀú, ³ª»çÁ¶ÀÓ¼ø¼­ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇØ 1-2-3-4, 2-3-1-4, 2-4-3-1ÀÇ ¼ø¼­·Î 15 NcmÀÇ ÈûÀ¸·Î Á¶ÀÌ°í, ´Ù½Ã °°Àº ¼ø¼­·Î ÃÖÁ¾ Á¶ÀÓÅäÅ©°ªÀÎ 30 Ncm±îÁö Á¶ÀÎ ÈÄ (2-step ¹æ¹ý) °¢ ³ª»çÀÇ Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©°ªÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ³ª»çÁ¶ÀÓ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇØ 2-3-1-4ÀÇ ¼ø¼­·Î ÇÑ ¹ø¿¡ ÃÖÁ¾ Á¶ÀÓÅäÅ©°ªÀÎ 30 Ncm±îÁö Á¶ÀÎ ÈÄ (1-step ¹æ¹ý) °¢ ³ª»çÀÇ Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©°ªÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© °°Àº ¼ø¼­ (2-3-1-4)ÀÇ 2-step ¹æ¹ý°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼¼ °¡Áö ³ª»çÁ¶ÀÓ¼ø¼­¿¡ µû¸¥ ³ª»çÀÇ Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©°ªÀº ¿ÜºÎ¿¬°á±¸Á¶¿¡¼­ 2-3-1-4±ºÀÌ 2-4-3-1±ºº¸´Ù À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³·¾Ò´Ù (p<0.05). ±×¸®°í ³»ºÎ¿¬°á±¸Á¶¿¡¼­µµ 2-3-1-4±ºÀÌ 2-4-3-1±º°ú 1-2-3-4±ºº¸´Ù À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³·¾Ò´Ù (p<0.05). ¶ÇÇÑ ³ª»çÁ¶ÀÓ¼ø¼­¿Í ¹«°üÇÏ°Ô ¸î ¹ø° Á¶¿©Áø ³ª»çÀÎÁö¿¡ µû¸¥ Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©°ªÀ» ºñ±³ÇØ º» °á°ú, ¿ÜºÎ¿¬°á±¸Á¶¿¡¼­´Â óÀ½¿¡ Á¶¿©Áø ³ª»ç°¡ µÎ ¹ø° Á¶¿©Áø ³ª»çº¸´Ù À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô¾ÒÀ¸³ª (p<0.05), ³»ºÎ¿¬°á±¸Á¶¿¡¼­´Â óÀ½¿¡ Á¶¿©Áø ³ª»ç¿¡¼­ºÎÅÍ ¸¶Áö¸·¿¡ Á¶¿©Áø ³ª»ç °£¿¡ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ±×¸®°í µÎ °¡Áö ³ª»çÁ¶ÀÓ¹æ¹ý °£¿¡´Â ¿ÜºÎ¿¬°á±¸Á¶¿Í ³»ºÎ¿¬°á±¸Á¶ ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ¿¬°á±¸Á¶¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºñ±³¿¡¼­ ¿ÜºÎ¿¬°á±¸Á¶¿Í ³»ºÎ¿¬°á±¸Á¶ÀÇ Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©°ªÀº °¢°¢ 16.27 Ncm, 14.25 Ncm ¿´À¸¸ç, Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù (p<0.05). ´Ù¼ö ÀÓÇ÷£Æ®¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÁöÁöµÇ´Â »óºÎ ±¸Á¶¹°À» ³ª»ç·Î ¿¬°áÇÒ ¶§, ³ª»çÁ¶ÀÓ¼ø¼­¿¡ µû¶ó Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, °¡¿îµ¥ºÎÅÍ Á¶ÀÎ °æ¿ì¿¡¼­ Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©°ªÀÌ ³·¾Ò°í, ¿¬°á±¸Á¶ °£¿¡µµ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©°ª¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀο¡ ´ëÇØ Á» ´õ »ó¼¼È÷ ºÐ¼®ÇÒ ÇÊ¿ä°¡ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÇÏÁß Á¶°Ç¿¡¼­ÀÇ ºÎ°¡ÀûÀÎ ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.

As implant treatment has become popular, lots of different shapes and materials of the implant upper component have been supplied. And there are also diverse reports about failures including loosening of the abutment screw which is one of the most common reason. Purpose : The purpose of this study is to find out how different screw tightening orders and methods influence on screw loosening according to the different connection systems. The upper component was fabricated by casting method. After fabricating master models that are precisely attached to the upper component, 5 experimental models each for the external connection system and internal connection system were fabricated using splinting impression technique. First, to find out the influence of the screw tightening order, screws were tightened in 3 orders; 1-2-3-4, 2-3-1-4, 2-4-3-1. After tightening, removal torque values (RTV) of each group was measured. And also to find out the influence of screw tightening method, a model with 2-3-1-4 screw tightening order was tightened with 30 Ncm at one time(1-step method) and the RTV was compared with the same order group (2-3-1-4) in the 2 step method. In the external connection system, RTV appeared significantly lower in group 2-3-1-4 than group 2-4-3-1 (p<0.05). And also in the internal connection system, the RTV of group 2-3-1-4 appeared significantly lower than that of group 2-4-3-1 and 1-2-3-4 (p<0.05). When comparing the tightening number of the screw without considering the screw tightening order, the first tightened screw appeared significantly higher RTV than the second one in the external connection system (p<0.05), however there was no significant difference from the first tightened screw to the last tightened screw in the internal connection system. And there was no statistically significant difference between the two screw tightening methods in both internal and external connection system. In the comparison of external and internal connection system, each RTV appeared 16.27 Ncm and 14.25 Ncm and appeared as a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). There was a significant difference in RTV measured according to the screw tightening order. The lowest RTV appeared in the groups started tightening from the middle. There was also a significant difference in RTV between the two connection system groups. A further study is needed to find out the influence factors in RTV and also a study is required related to the load condition.

Å°¿öµå

³ª»çÁ¶ÀÓ¹æ¹ý;³ª»çÁ¶ÀÓ¼ø¼­;ÀÓÇ÷£Æ® ¿¬°á±¸Á¶;Ç®¸²ÅäÅ©°ª
Implant connection system;Removal torque values;Screw tightening method;Screw tightening sequence

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI